Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

71

VS

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

82

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
45.3vs68.4

+23.1 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs57.2

+13.4 difference

Knowledge

GLM-4.7
60.6vs48

+12.6 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$1 / $3

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 82 to 71. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 68.4 against 45.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 68.4%. GLM-4.7 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.00 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 82 to 71. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 68.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.6 versus 48. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 57.2. MiMo-V2.5-Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.4 versus 45.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.