GLM-4.7 vs Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 67 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 46.6 against 35. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 78 to 62. Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-4.7 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning).

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Agentic

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

66.1

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

58.5

67
Terminal-Bench 2.0
60
72
BrowseComp
61
61
OSWorld-Verified
55

Coding

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

46.6

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

35

78
HumanEval
62
43
SWE-bench Verified
39
43
LiveCodeBench
33
51
SWE-bench Pro
36

Multimodal & Grounded

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7

70.5

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

71.5

66
MMMU-Pro
71
76
OfficeQA Pro
72

Reasoning

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

80.2

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

69.2

82
SimpleQA
70
80
MuSR
70
84
BBH
80
79
LongBench v2
66
78
MRCRv2
66

Knowledge

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

61.8

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

52.1

86
MMLU
71
84
GPQA
70
82
SuperGPQA
68
80
OpenBookQA
66
74
MMLU-Pro
69
16
HLE
7
72
FrontierScience
62

Instruction Following

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

85

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

81

85
IFEval
81

Multilingual

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

79.1

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

77.8

81
MGSM
81
78
MMLU-ProX
76

Mathematics

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

85

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

75.2

86
AIME 2023
73
88
AIME 2024
75
87
AIME 2025
74
82
HMMT Feb 2023
69
84
HMMT Feb 2024
71
83
HMMT Feb 2025
70
85
BRUMO 2025
72
85
MATH-500
79

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7 is ahead overall, 67 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 78 and 62.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.8 versus 52.1. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 46.6 versus 35. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85 versus 75.2. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-4.7 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 80.2 versus 69.2. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.1 versus 58.5. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GLM-4.7 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.5 versus 70.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GLM-4.7 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 85 versus 81. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, GLM-4.7 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.1 versus 77.8. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.