Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

71

VS

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

72

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
45.3vs65.4

+20.1 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs54.1

+16.5 difference

Knowledge

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
60.6vs73.9

+13.3 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

N/A

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 71. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)'s sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.4 against 45.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 65.4%. GLM-4.7 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 71. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 65.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.9 versus 60.6. GLM-4.7 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 54.1. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.4 versus 45.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.