GLM-4.7 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
GLM-4.7 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
GLM-4.7
63
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
53
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #34 · Qwen3.5-35B-A3B #32
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Δ | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | 52.1 | → 29.6 | 81.7 |
| Coding | 73.8 | ← 13.2 | 60.6 |
| Agentic | 45.7 | → 5.3 | 51.0 |
| Reasoning | — | — | 59.0 |
| Math | 1.8 | — | — |
| Multilingual | — | — | 81.0 |
| Inst. Following | — | — | 91.9 |
Operational Comparison
GLM-4.7
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
N/A
200K
262K
Quick Verdict
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.
GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 63 to 53. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 73.8 against 60.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is BrowseComp, 52% to 61%. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (4)
Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?
GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 63 to 53. The biggest single separator in this matchup is BrowseComp, where the scores are 52% and 61%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.7 versus 52.1. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?
GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.8 versus 60.6. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 51 versus 45.7. Inside this category, Gert Labs is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.