Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

67

VS

Qwen3.6 Plus

65

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 unranked · Qwen3.6 Plus #16

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6 Plus only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6 Plus
45.3vs61.6

+16.3 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs64.8

+5.8 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6 Plus
60.6vs66

+5.4 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

Qwen3.6 Plus

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$null / $null

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (first answer)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6 Plus only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

GLM-4.7 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 67 versus 65. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 70.6 against 64.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 61.6%. Qwen3.6 Plus does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.6 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 67 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 61.6%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66 versus 60.6. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 64.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.6 versus 45.3. Inside this category, VITA-Bench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 4, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.