Head-to-head comparison across 6 benchmark categories
GLM-4.7
74
Qwen3.6 Plus
69
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6 Plus only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Agentic
+1.0 difference
Coding
+4.4 difference
Reasoning
+16.9 difference
Knowledge
+8.8 difference
Multilingual
+1.1 difference
Multimodal
+8.3 difference
GLM-4.7
Qwen3.6 Plus
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
N/A
200K
1M
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6 Plus only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 74 to 69. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 78.9 against 62. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is VITA-Bench, 15.5% to 44.3%. Qwen3.6 Plus does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Qwen3.6 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
GLM-4.7 is ahead overall, 74 to 69. The biggest single separator in this matchup is VITA-Bench, where the scores are 15.5% and 44.3%.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 66. Inside this category, SuperGPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 69.3 versus 64.9. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 78.9 versus 62. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 62 versus 61. Inside this category, VITA-Bench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.8 versus 70.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.7 versus 83.6. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.