GLM-4.7 vs Seed-2.0-Mini

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 67 to 53. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 46.6 against 24.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 67 to 43. Seed-2.0-Mini does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-4.7 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Seed-2.0-Mini is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed-2.0-Mini gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Seed-2.0-Mini only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Agentic

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

66.1

Seed-2.0-Mini

46.2

67
Terminal-Bench 2.0
43
72
BrowseComp
53
61
OSWorld-Verified
45

Coding

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

46.6

Seed-2.0-Mini

24.7

78
HumanEval
55
43
SWE-bench Verified
22
43
LiveCodeBench
21
51
SWE-bench Pro
29

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed-2.0-Mini

GLM-4.7

70.5

Seed-2.0-Mini

73.1

66
MMMU-Pro
74
76
OfficeQA Pro
72

Reasoning

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

80.2

Seed-2.0-Mini

64.8

82
SimpleQA
59
80
MuSR
57
84
BBH
73
79
LongBench v2
68
78
MRCRv2
72

Knowledge

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

61.8

Seed-2.0-Mini

44.6

86
MMLU
62
84
GPQA
61
82
SuperGPQA
59
80
OpenBookQA
57
74
MMLU-Pro
62
16
HLE
1
72
FrontierScience
54

Instruction Following

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

85

Seed-2.0-Mini

80

85
IFEval
80

Multilingual

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

79.1

Seed-2.0-Mini

71.8

81
MGSM
75
78
MMLU-ProX
70

Mathematics

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7

85

Seed-2.0-Mini

65.1

86
AIME 2023
62
88
AIME 2024
64
87
AIME 2025
63
82
HMMT Feb 2023
58
84
HMMT Feb 2024
60
83
HMMT Feb 2025
59
85
BRUMO 2025
61
85
MATH-500
70

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

GLM-4.7 is ahead overall, 67 to 53. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 67 and 43.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.8 versus 44.6. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 46.6 versus 24.7. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85 versus 65.1. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-4.7 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 80.2 versus 64.8. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.1 versus 46.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GLM-4.7 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

Seed-2.0-Mini has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 70.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GLM-4.7 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 85 versus 80. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, GLM-4.7 or Seed-2.0-Mini?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.1 versus 71.8. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.