Skip to main content

GLM-5.1 vs Kimi K2.6

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.1

83

VS

Kimi K2.6

84

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.1 #21 · Kimi K2.6 #6

Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5.1 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Kimi K2.6
65.3vs73.1

+7.8 difference

Coding

Kimi K2.6
60.9vs72

+11.1 difference

Knowledge

Kimi K2.6
52.3vs53.8

+1.5 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.1

Kimi K2.6

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$0.95 / $4

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

203K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5.1 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Kimi K2.6 finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 84 to 83. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

Kimi K2.6's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72 against 60.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 52.3% to 34.7%.

GLM-5.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.6. Kimi K2.6 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 203K for GLM-5.1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 84 to 83. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 52.3% and 34.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.1 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53.8 versus 52.3. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.1 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 60.9. Inside this category, Vibe Code Bench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.1 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 65.3. Inside this category, MCP Atlas is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
Kimi K2.6
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.