Skip to main content

GLM-5.1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.1

84

VS

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

82

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5-Pro only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
65.3vs68.4

+3.1 difference

Coding

GLM-5.1
60.9vs57.2

+3.7 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5.1
52.3vs48

+4.3 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.1

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$1 / $3

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

203K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5-Pro only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GLM-5.1 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 84 versus 82. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

GLM-5.1's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 52.3 against 48. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 63.5% to 68.4%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-5.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.00 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 203K for GLM-5.1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 84 to 82. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 63.5% and 68.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.3 versus 48. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60.9 versus 57.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.4 versus 65.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
API / mo$3,000
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.