Skip to main content

GLM-5.1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.1

82

VS

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

85

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.1 #29 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro unranked

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5.1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
65.3vs68.4

+3.1 difference

Coding

GLM-5.1
60.9vs57.2

+3.7 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5.1
52.3vs48

+4.3 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.1

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

203K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5.1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 85 versus 82. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 68.4 against 65.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 63.5% to 68.4%. GLM-5.1 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 203K for GLM-5.1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 85 to 82. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 63.5% and 68.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.3 versus 48. Inside this category, AA-HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60.9 versus 57.2. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.4 versus 65.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 13, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.