Skip to main content

GLM-5.1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.1

82

VS

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

86

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.1 #25 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro unranked

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5.1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
65.3vs68.4

+3.1 difference

Coding

GLM-5.1
60.9vs57.2

+3.7 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5.1
52.3vs48

+4.3 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.1

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

203K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5.1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 86 to 82. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 68.4 against 65.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 63.5% to 68.4%. GLM-5.1 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 203K for GLM-5.1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 86 to 82. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 63.5% and 68.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.3 versus 48. Inside this category, AA-HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60.9 versus 57.2. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.4 versus 65.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.