GLM-5 (Reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

GLM-5 (Reasoning) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 78 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5 (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 62.5 against 8.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 88 to 17.

GLM-5 (Reasoning) gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking.

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5 (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Agentic

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

78.3

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

34.1

81
Terminal-Bench 2.0
34
80
BrowseComp
37
74
OSWorld-Verified
32

Coding

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

62.5

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

8.2

88
HumanEval
17
62
SWE-bench Verified
10
58
LiveCodeBench
9
67
SWE-bench Pro
7

Multimodal & Grounded

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

78.5

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

32.4

74
MMMU-Pro
27
84
OfficeQA Pro
39

Reasoning

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

88.9

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

38.4

92
SimpleQA
29
90
MuSR
31
91
BBH
67
86
LongBench v2
39
87
MRCRv2
42

Knowledge

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

72

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

27

96
MMLU
27
94
GPQA
26
92
SuperGPQA
24
90
OpenBookQA
22
81
MMLU-Pro
51
29
HLE
2
83
FrontierScience
31

Instruction Following

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

92

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

72

92
IFEval
72

Multilingual

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

86.4

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

60.7

89
MGSM
62
85
MMLU-ProX
60

Mathematics

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

94.4

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

42.3

98
AIME 2023
28
99
AIME 2024
30
98
AIME 2025
29
94
HMMT Feb 2023
24
96
HMMT Feb 2024
26
95
HMMT Feb 2025
25
96
BRUMO 2025
27
92
MATH-500
61

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) is ahead overall, 78 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 88 and 17.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 27. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.5 versus 8.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 94.4 versus 42.3. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 88.9 versus 38.4. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.3 versus 34.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.5 versus 32.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 92 versus 72. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 86.4 versus 60.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.