Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
GLM-5 (Reasoning) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 84 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-5 (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 96 against 86. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 94 to 79.
Pick GLM-5 (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1-pro only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
GLM-5 (Reasoning)
80.3
o1-pro
79
GLM-5 (Reasoning)
96
o1-pro
86
GLM-5 (Reasoning) is ahead overall, 84 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 94 and 79.
GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.3 versus 79. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 96 versus 86. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.