GLM-5 (Reasoning) vs Seed 1.6

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

GLM-5 (Reasoning) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 78 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5 (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 62.5 against 42.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2023, 98 to 72. Seed 1.6 does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Seed 1.6 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-5 (Reasoning).

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5 (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Seed 1.6 only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Agentic

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

78.3

Seed 1.6

62.3

81
Terminal-Bench 2.0
63
80
BrowseComp
67
74
OSWorld-Verified
58

Coding

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

62.5

Seed 1.6

42.4

88
HumanEval
64
62
SWE-bench Verified
46
58
LiveCodeBench
38
67
SWE-bench Pro
46

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed 1.6

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

78.5

Seed 1.6

79.6

74
MMMU-Pro
80
84
OfficeQA Pro
79

Reasoning

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

88.9

Seed 1.6

74.5

92
SimpleQA
69
90
MuSR
69
91
BBH
86
86
LongBench v2
77
87
MRCRv2
78

Knowledge

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

72

Seed 1.6

56.4

96
MMLU
73
94
GPQA
72
92
SuperGPQA
70
90
OpenBookQA
68
81
MMLU-Pro
75
29
HLE
11
83
FrontierScience
68

Instruction Following

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

92

Seed 1.6

87

92
IFEval
87

Multilingual

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

86.4

Seed 1.6

83.4

89
MGSM
88
85
MMLU-ProX
81

Mathematics

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

94.4

Seed 1.6

75.9

98
AIME 2023
72
99
AIME 2024
74
98
AIME 2025
73
94
HMMT Feb 2023
68
96
HMMT Feb 2024
70
95
HMMT Feb 2025
69
96
BRUMO 2025
71
92
MATH-500
82

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Seed 1.6?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) is ahead overall, 78 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2023, where the scores are 98 and 72.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Seed 1.6?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 56.4. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Seed 1.6?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.5 versus 42.4. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Seed 1.6?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 94.4 versus 75.9. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Seed 1.6?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 88.9 versus 74.5. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Seed 1.6?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.3 versus 62.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Seed 1.6?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 78.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Seed 1.6?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 92 versus 87. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Seed 1.6?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 86.4 versus 83.4. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.