Skip to main content

GLM-5 vs GPT-5.2

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5

77

VS

GPT-5.2

83

2 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5 #12 · GPT-5.2 unranked

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5 only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5
56.2vs55.2

+1.0 difference

Coding

GPT-5.2
63.2vs64.7

+1.5 difference

Reasoning

GLM-5
60.8vs52.9

+7.9 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.2
70.7vs92.4

+21.7 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5

GPT-5.2

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$2 / $8

Speed

74 t/s

73 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

1.64s

130.34s

Context Window

200K

400K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5 only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 77. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 70.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 86% to 92.4%. GLM-5 does hit back in reasoning, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while GLM-5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for GLM-5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, GLM-5 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 77. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 86% and 92.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 70.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.7 versus 63.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-5 or GPT-5.2?

GLM-5 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 60.8 versus 52.9. GPT-5.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5 or GPT-5.2?

GLM-5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.2 versus 55.2. GPT-5.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.