Skip to main content

GLM-5 vs MiMo-V2.5

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5

67

VS

MiMo-V2.5

72

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5 #21 · MiMo-V2.5 unranked

Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiMo-V2.5
56.2vs65.8

+9.6 difference

Coding

GLM-5
63.2vs56.1

+7.1 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5

MiMo-V2.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1 / $3.2

$null / $null

Speed

74 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.64s

N/A

Context Window

200K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

MiMo-V2.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 67. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiMo-V2.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.8 against 56.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 56.2% to 65.8%. GLM-5 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiMo-V2.5 is the reasoning model in the pair, while GLM-5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GLM-5 or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 67. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 56.2% and 65.8%.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5 or MiMo-V2.5?

GLM-5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 63.2 versus 56.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5 or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.8 versus 56.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.