Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 87 to 49. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 96.7 against 9.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2024, 98 to 9.8.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 nano. That is roughly 20.0x on output cost alone. GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-4.1 nano is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-4.1 nano gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark.
Pick GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 nano only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1M context window.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
85.6
GPT-4.1 nano
47.4
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
82.3
GPT-4.1 nano
18
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
88.3
GPT-4.1 nano
59.3
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
92.7
GPT-4.1 nano
74.1
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
78.3
GPT-4.1 nano
50.7
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
92
GPT-4.1 nano
83.2
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
90.8
GPT-4.1 nano
59
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
96.7
GPT-4.1 nano
9.8
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is ahead overall, 87 to 49. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2024, where the scores are 98 and 9.8.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.3 versus 50.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 82.3 versus 18. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 96.7 versus 9.8. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 92.7 versus 74.1. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 85.6 versus 47.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.3 versus 59.3. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 92 versus 83.2. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 90.8 versus 59. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.