Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Grok Code Fast 1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.14/100
Margin
3.4pts
← winning
37.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 nano #170 (Estimated); Grok Code Fast 1 #189 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 nano and Grok Code Fast 1 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to GPT-4.1 nano; 1 to Grok Code Fast 1.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
11
GPT-4.1 nano only
10
Grok Code Fast 1 only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4.1 nano and Grok Code Fast 1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok Code Fast 1 is priced at $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 nano. GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Grok Code Fast 1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 nano and Grok Code Fast 1
CategoryGPT-4.1 nanoΔGrok Code Fast 1
CodingGPT-4.1 nanoNot measuredMarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 170.8
KnowledgeGPT-4.1 nano50.3MarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 1Not measured
MathGPT-4.1 nano1.0MarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 1Not measured
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.1 nano83.2MarginNo overlapGrok Code Fast 1Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoGrok Code Fast 1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputGPT-4.1 nano has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sGPT-4.1 nano has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sGrok Code Fast 12.81 sGPT-4.1 nano reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.1 nano1MGrok Code Fast 1256KGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok Code Fast 1Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%75.7%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 63Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok Code Fast 1Result
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%36.2%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 70.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok Code Fast 1Result
AA-LCRSource 17.0%48.3%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok Code Fast 1Result
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.6%21.6%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.2%72.7%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-HLESource 3.9%7.5%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%-36.0%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%23.8%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%78.5%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok Code Fast 1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok Code Fast 1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1003Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoGrok Code Fast 1Result
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%41.4%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4.1 nano and Grok Code Fast 1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4.1 nano and Grok Code Fast 1 today?

GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026