Skip to main content

GPT-4.1 nano vs Kimi K2.5

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-4.1 nano

27

VS

Kimi K2.5

64

0 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 nano unranked · Kimi K2.5 #11

Pick Kimi K2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 nano only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

Kimi K2.5
50.3vs65.1

+14.8 difference

Inst. Following

Kimi K2.5
83.2vs93.9

+10.7 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-4.1 nano

Kimi K2.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.1 / $0.4

$0.6 / $3

Speed

181 t/s

45 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

0.63s

2.38s

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Kimi K2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 nano only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1M context window.

Kimi K2.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 64 to 27. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Kimi K2.5's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 65.1 against 50.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 50.3% to 87.6%.

Kimi K2.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 nano. That is roughly 7.5x on output cost alone. GPT-4.1 nano gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GPT-4.1 nano or Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 64 to 27. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 50.3% and 87.6%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-4.1 nano or Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.1 versus 50.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GPT-4.1 nano or Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.9 versus 83.2. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-4.1 nano
API / mo$375
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Kimi K2.5
API / mo$2,700
Self-host / mo$5,221
Break-even132M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.