Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-4.1
58
GPT-5.4 nano
60
Pick GPT-5.4 nano if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Knowledge
+13.1 difference
GPT-4.1
GPT-5.4 nano
$2 / $8
$0.2 / $1.25
108 t/s
191 t/s
1.02s
3.64s
1M
400K
Pick GPT-5.4 nano if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
GPT-5.4 nano has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 60 versus 58. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
GPT-4.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.4 nano. That is roughly 6.4x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 nano is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-4.1 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-4.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.4 nano.
GPT-5.4 nano is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 58. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 66.3% and 82.8%.
GPT-4.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.3 versus 53.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.