Skip to main content

GPT-4.1 vs Ling 2.6 Flash

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-4.1

60

VS

Ling 2.6 Flash

44

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick GPT-4.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ling 2.6 Flash only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

GPT-4.1
54.6vs27

+27.6 difference

Knowledge

GPT-4.1
66.3vs59

+7.3 difference

Inst. Following

GPT-4.1
87.4vs57

+30.4 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-4.1

Ling 2.6 Flash

Price (per 1M tokens)

$2 / $8

$0.1 / $0.3

Speed

108 t/s

209.5 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

1.02s

1.07s

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-4.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ling 2.6 Flash only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-4.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 60 to 44. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-4.1's sharpest advantage is in instruction following, where it averages 87.4 against 57. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 66.3% to 59%.

GPT-4.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens for Ling 2.6 Flash. That is roughly 26.7x on output cost alone. GPT-4.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Ling 2.6 Flash.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-4.1 or Ling 2.6 Flash?

GPT-4.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 44. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 66.3% and 59%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-4.1 or Ling 2.6 Flash?

GPT-4.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.3 versus 59. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GPT-4.1 or Ling 2.6 Flash?

GPT-4.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 54.6 versus 27. Ling 2.6 Flash stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for instruction following, GPT-4.1 or Ling 2.6 Flash?

GPT-4.1 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 87.4 versus 57. Ling 2.6 Flash stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.