Head-to-head comparison across 0benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-5.2-Codex
--
Llama 4 Scout
--
Benchmark data for GPT-5.2-Codex and Llama 4 Scout is coming soon on BenchLM.
GPT-5.2-Codex
Llama 4 Scout
$2 / $8
$0 / $0
123 t/s
128 t/s
87.34s
0.70s
400K
10M
Benchmark data for GPT-5.2-Codex and Llama 4 Scout is coming soon on BenchLM.
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GPT-5.2-Codex and Llama 4 Scout yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
GPT-5.2-Codex is priced at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.2-Codex.
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
GPT-5.2-Codex: $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.