Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
GPT-5.2 Pro is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 90 to 59. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.2 Pro's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 84.8 against 41.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 89 to 44.
GPT-5.2 Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while Nemotron 3 Super 100B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Nemotron 3 Super 100B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.2 Pro.
Pick GPT-5.2 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Super 100B only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
GPT-5.2 Pro
85.9
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
56.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
84.8
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
41.3
GPT-5.2 Pro
96
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
60.4
GPT-5.2 Pro
95.2
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
69.5
GPT-5.2 Pro
81.5
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
52.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
95
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
84
GPT-5.2 Pro
93.4
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
79.5
GPT-5.2 Pro
98.2
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
72.6
GPT-5.2 Pro is ahead overall, 90 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 89 and 44.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 52.8. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 84.8 versus 41.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 98.2 versus 72.6. Inside this category, HMMT Feb 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 95.2 versus 69.5. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 85.9 versus 56.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 96 versus 60.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 95 versus 84. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.2 Pro has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 93.4 versus 79.5. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.