Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2.5

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.2

83

VS

MiMo-V2.5

74

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiMo-V2.5
55.2vs65.8

+10.6 difference

Coding

GPT-5.2
64.7vs56.1

+8.6 difference

Multimodal

GPT-5.2
79.5vs77.9

+1.6 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.2

MiMo-V2.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$2 / $8

$0.4 / $2

Speed

73 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

130.34s

N/A

Context Window

400K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 74. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 64.7 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 79.5% to 77.9%. MiMo-V2.5 does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.40 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens for MiMo-V2.5. That is roughly 4.0x on output cost alone. MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.2.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 74. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 79.5% and 77.9%.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.2 or MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.7 versus 56.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.2 or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.8 versus 55.2. GPT-5.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.2 or MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.5 versus 77.9. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.