GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark vs Llama 4 Behemoth

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 87 to 40. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 82.3 against 14.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 85 to 15.

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is the reasoning model in the pair, while Llama 4 Behemoth is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 32K for Llama 4 Behemoth.

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Llama 4 Behemoth only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

85.6

Llama 4 Behemoth

34.6

90
Terminal-Bench 2.0
33
82
BrowseComp
38
83
OSWorld-Verified
34

Coding

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

82.3

Llama 4 Behemoth

14.1

91
HumanEval
40
80
SWE-bench Verified
15
80
LiveCodeBench
13
85
SWE-bench Pro
15

Multimodal & Grounded

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

88.3

Llama 4 Behemoth

55.1

86
MMMU-Pro
60
91
OfficeQA Pro
49

Reasoning

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

92.7

Llama 4 Behemoth

47.1

94
SimpleQA
46
92
MuSR
44
97
BBH
62
91
LongBench v2
46
92
MRCRv2
46

Knowledge

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

78.3

Llama 4 Behemoth

36.7

97
MMLU
48
95
GPQA
47
93
SuperGPQA
45
91
OpenBookQA
43
88
MMLU-Pro
54
42
HLE
3
88
FrontierScience
43

Instruction Following

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

92

Llama 4 Behemoth

68

92
IFEval
68

Multilingual

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

90.8

Llama 4 Behemoth

62.8

94
MGSM
66
89
MMLU-ProX
61

Mathematics

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark

96.7

Llama 4 Behemoth

52.9

98
AIME 2023
48
98
AIME 2024
50
97
AIME 2025
49
94
HMMT Feb 2023
44
96
HMMT Feb 2024
46
95
HMMT Feb 2025
45
95
BRUMO 2025
47
98
MATH-500
60

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Llama 4 Behemoth?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is ahead overall, 87 to 40. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 85 and 15.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Llama 4 Behemoth?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.3 versus 36.7. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Llama 4 Behemoth?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 82.3 versus 14.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Llama 4 Behemoth?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 96.7 versus 52.9. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Llama 4 Behemoth?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 92.7 versus 47.1. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Llama 4 Behemoth?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 85.6 versus 34.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Llama 4 Behemoth?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.3 versus 55.1. Inside this category, OfficeQA Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Llama 4 Behemoth?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 92 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Llama 4 Behemoth?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 90.8 versus 62.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.