Skip to main content

GPT-5.4 nano vs Kimi K2.6

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.4 nano

60

VS

Kimi K2.6

84

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 nano unranked · Kimi K2.6 #6

Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 400K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Kimi K2.6
42.9vs73.1

+30.2 difference

Knowledge

Kimi K2.6
53.2vs53.8

+0.6 difference

Multimodal

Kimi K2.6
66.1vs79.7

+13.6 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.4 nano

Kimi K2.6

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.2 / $1.25

$0.95 / $4

Speed

191 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

3.64s

N/A

Context Window

400K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 400K context window.

Kimi K2.6 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 84 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Kimi K2.6's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 73.1 against 42.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 39% to 73.1%.

Kimi K2.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.4 nano. That is roughly 3.2x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 nano gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.6.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 nano or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 84 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 39% and 73.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53.8 versus 53.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 42.9. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.7 versus 66.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.