Skip to main content

GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.6-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.4 nano

62

VS

Qwen3.6-27B

72

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 nano unranked · Qwen3.6-27B #10

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 400K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6-27B
42.9vs59.3

+16.4 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6-27B
53.2vs62.2

+9.0 difference

Multimodal

Qwen3.6-27B
66.1vs75.8

+9.7 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.4 nano

Qwen3.6-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.2 / $1.25

$0 / $0

Speed

191 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

3.64s

N/A

Context Window

400K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 400K context window.

Qwen3.6-27B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.6-27B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 59.3 against 42.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 37.7% to 24%.

GPT-5.4 nano is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.20 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.6-27B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 nano gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-27B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 37.7% and 24%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.2 versus 53.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 59.3 versus 42.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.8 versus 66.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-5.4 nano
API / mo$1,088
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.