Skip to main content

GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.4 nano

60

VS

Qwen3.6 Plus

73

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 nano unranked · Qwen3.6 Plus #12

Pick Qwen3.6 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6 Plus
42.9vs61.6

+18.7 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6 Plus
53.2vs66

+12.8 difference

Multimodal

Qwen3.6 Plus
66.1vs79.6

+13.5 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.4 nano

Qwen3.6 Plus

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.2 / $1.25

$null / $null

Speed

191 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

3.64s

N/A

Context Window

400K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Qwen3.6 Plus is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 73 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.6 Plus's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 61.6 against 42.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 46.3% to 61.6%.

Qwen3.6 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.4 nano.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 73 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 46.3% and 61.6%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66 versus 53.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.6 versus 42.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 66.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.