GPT-5 (medium) vs Seed-2.0-Lite

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

GPT-5 (medium) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 78 to 63. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5 (medium)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 66.1 against 41.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 72 to 45. Seed-2.0-Lite does hit back in instruction following, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5 (medium) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Seed-2.0-Lite is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed-2.0-Lite gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for GPT-5 (medium).

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5 (medium) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Seed-2.0-Lite only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Agentic

GPT-5 (medium)

GPT-5 (medium)

75.5

Seed-2.0-Lite

55.1

77
Terminal-Bench 2.0
52
78
BrowseComp
63
72
OSWorld-Verified
53

Coding

GPT-5 (medium)

GPT-5 (medium)

66.1

Seed-2.0-Lite

41.4

83
HumanEval
63
67
SWE-bench Verified
45
60
LiveCodeBench
37
72
SWE-bench Pro
45

Multimodal & Grounded

GPT-5 (medium)

GPT-5 (medium)

88.1

Seed-2.0-Lite

79.6

89
MMMU-Pro
80
87
OfficeQA Pro
79

Reasoning

GPT-5 (medium)

GPT-5 (medium)

84.3

Seed-2.0-Lite

73

87
SimpleQA
68
85
MuSR
66
92
BBH
85
81
LongBench v2
76
81
MRCRv2
77

Knowledge

GPT-5 (medium)

GPT-5 (medium)

69.8

Seed-2.0-Lite

53.9

91
MMLU
71
89
GPQA
70
87
SuperGPQA
68
85
OpenBookQA
66
81
MMLU-Pro
73
27
HLE
7
82
FrontierScience
66

Instruction Following

Seed-2.0-Lite

GPT-5 (medium)

88

Seed-2.0-Lite

89

88
IFEval
89

Multilingual

GPT-5 (medium)

GPT-5 (medium)

88.1

Seed-2.0-Lite

82.5

90
MGSM
87
87
MMLU-ProX
80

Mathematics

GPT-5 (medium)

GPT-5 (medium)

92

Seed-2.0-Lite

75

93
AIME 2023
71
95
AIME 2024
73
94
AIME 2025
72
89
HMMT Feb 2023
67
91
HMMT Feb 2024
69
90
HMMT Feb 2025
68
92
BRUMO 2025
70
92
MATH-500
81

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GPT-5 (medium) or Seed-2.0-Lite?

GPT-5 (medium) is ahead overall, 78 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 72 and 45.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5 (medium) or Seed-2.0-Lite?

GPT-5 (medium) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.8 versus 53.9. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5 (medium) or Seed-2.0-Lite?

GPT-5 (medium) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 66.1 versus 41.4. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GPT-5 (medium) or Seed-2.0-Lite?

GPT-5 (medium) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 92 versus 75. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, GPT-5 (medium) or Seed-2.0-Lite?

GPT-5 (medium) has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 84.3 versus 73. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5 (medium) or Seed-2.0-Lite?

GPT-5 (medium) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 55.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5 (medium) or Seed-2.0-Lite?

GPT-5 (medium) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.1 versus 79.6. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GPT-5 (medium) or Seed-2.0-Lite?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 89 versus 88. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, GPT-5 (medium) or Seed-2.0-Lite?

GPT-5 (medium) has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.1 versus 82.5. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.