Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
GPT-5 mini is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 69 to 30. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5 mini's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 83.8 against 32.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 80 to 14.
GPT-5 mini is the reasoning model in the pair, while LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5 mini gives you the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct.
Pick GPT-5 mini if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
GPT-5 mini
65.7
LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct
25.7
GPT-5 mini
42.8
LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct
7.2
GPT-5 mini
83.8
LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct
32.4
GPT-5 mini
81.8
LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct
32.1
GPT-5 mini
62.8
LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct
26
GPT-5 mini
82
LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct
80
GPT-5 mini
80.1
LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct
60.7
GPT-5 mini
87.2
LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct
37
GPT-5 mini is ahead overall, 69 to 30. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 80 and 14.
GPT-5 mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.8 versus 26. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5 mini has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 42.8 versus 7.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5 mini has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 87.2 versus 37. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5 mini has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 32.1. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5 mini has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.7 versus 25.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5 mini has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.8 versus 32.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5 mini has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 82 versus 80. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5 mini has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.1 versus 60.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.