Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Granite-4.0-H-1B
~43
Winner · 1/8 categoriesNova Pro
34
2/8 categoriesGranite-4.0-H-1B· Nova Pro
Pick Granite-4.0-H-1B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nova Pro only becomes the better choice if multilingual is the priority.
Granite-4.0-H-1B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 43 to 34. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Granite-4.0-H-1B's sharpest advantage is in instruction following, where it averages 77.4 against 66. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 74% to 33%. Nova Pro does hit back in multilingual, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Granite-4.0-H-1B | Nova Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | — | 31% |
| BrowseComp | — | 39% |
| OSWorld-Verified | — | 32% |
| Coding | ||
| HumanEval | 74% | 33% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 19% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 14% |
| SWE-bench Pro | — | 20% |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| MMMU-Pro | — | 37% |
| OfficeQA Pro | — | 46% |
| Reasoning | ||
| BBH | 60.4% | — |
| MuSR | — | 37% |
| LongBench v2 | — | 51% |
| KnowledgeNova Pro wins | ||
| MMLU | 59.4% | 41% |
| GPQA | 29.9% | 40% |
| MMLU-Pro | 34.0% | 53% |
| SuperGPQA | — | 38% |
| FrontierScience | — | 41% |
| SimpleQA | — | 39% |
| Instruction FollowingGranite-4.0-H-1B wins | ||
| IFEval | 77.4% | 66% |
| MultilingualNova Pro wins | ||
| MGSM | 37.8% | 61% |
| MMLU-ProX | — | 60% |
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2023 | — | 41% |
| AIME 2024 | — | 43% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 42% |
| HMMT Feb 2023 | — | 37% |
| HMMT Feb 2024 | — | 39% |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | — | 38% |
| BRUMO 2025 | — | 40% |
| MATH-500 | — | 59% |
Granite-4.0-H-1B is ahead overall, 43 to 34. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 74% and 33%.
Nova Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 43.5 versus 32.6. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Granite-4.0-H-1B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 77.4 versus 66. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Nova Pro has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.4 versus 37.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.