Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Grok 3 Mini
~49
0/8 categoriesSarvam 105B
60
Winner · 2/8 categoriesGrok 3 Mini· Sarvam 105B
Pick Sarvam 105B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 3 Mini only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Sarvam 105B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 60 to 49. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Sarvam 105B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.7 against 59.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 78.9% to 81.7%.
Grok 3 Mini is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.30 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Sarvam 105B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Grok 3 Mini | Sarvam 105B |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic | ||
| BrowseComp | — | 49.5% |
| CodingSarvam 105B wins | ||
| LiveCodeBench | 41.5% | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | — | 71.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 45% |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| gpqaDiamond | — | 78.7% |
| hle | — | 11.2% |
| KnowledgeSarvam 105B wins | ||
| GPQA | 66.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.9% | 81.7% |
| SimpleQA | 21.7% | — |
| MMLU | — | 90.6% |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | — | 84.8% |
| Multilingual | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2024 | 95.8% | — |
| MATH-500 | — | 98.6% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 88.3% |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | — | 85.8% |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | — | 85.8% |
Sarvam 105B is ahead overall, 60 to 49. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 78.9% and 81.7%.
Sarvam 105B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.7 versus 59.8. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Sarvam 105B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 45 versus 41.5. Grok 3 Mini stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.