Skip to main content

Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.6

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Grok 4.3

79

VS

Kimi K2.6

84

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Grok 4.3 unranked · Kimi K2.6 #6

Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.3 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Kimi K2.6
47.3vs72

+24.7 difference

Knowledge

Grok 4.3
53.9vs53.8

+0.1 difference

Multimodal

Kimi K2.6
78.1vs79.7

+1.6 difference

Operational Comparison

Grok 4.3

Kimi K2.6

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.25 / $2.5

$0.95 / $4

Speed

209 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

12.36s

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.3 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Kimi K2.6 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 84 to 79. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Kimi K2.6's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 72 against 47.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SciCode, 47.3% to 52.2%. Grok 4.3 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Kimi K2.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.25 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok 4.3. Grok 4.3 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.6.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 84 to 79. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SciCode, where the scores are 47.3% and 52.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.6?

Grok 4.3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53.9 versus 53.8. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 47.3. Inside this category, SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.7 versus 78.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Grok 4.3
API / mo$2,813
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Kimi K2.6
API / mo$3,713
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even326M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 1, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.