Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Ministral 3 14B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
37.75/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok Code Fast 1 #189 (Supported); Ministral 3 14B #196 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok Code Fast 1 and Ministral 3 14B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Grok Code Fast 1; 0 to Ministral 3 14B.

Updated July 28, 2026
Shared results
0
Grok Code Fast 1 only
12
Ministral 3 14B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok Code Fast 1 and Ministral 3 14B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Ministral 3 14B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Grok Code Fast 1 is priced at $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens for Ministral 3 14B. Grok Code Fast 1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 14B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok Code Fast 1Ministral 3 14BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputMinistral 3 14B$0.2 input / $0.2 outputMinistral 3 14B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sMinistral 3 14B110 tok/sGrok Code Fast 1 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok Code Fast 12.81 sMinistral 3 14B0.60 sMinistral 3 14B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok Code Fast 1256KMinistral 3 14B128KGrok Code Fast 1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Ministral 3 14BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 75.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Ministral 3 14BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 70.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Ministral 3 14BResult
AA-LCRSource 48.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Ministral 3 14BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 21.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 72.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 7.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 23.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Ministral 3 14BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 41.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok Code Fast 1 and Ministral 3 14B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok Code Fast 1 and Ministral 3 14B today?

Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Ministral 3 14B: $0.20 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.