Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 500B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 65 to 49. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 500B gives you the larger context window at 10M, compared with 256K for K-Exaone.
Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra 500B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. K-Exaone only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
K-Exaone
49.4
Nemotron 3 Ultra 500B
41.4
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 500B is ahead overall, 65 to 49. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 49.4% and 42%.
K-Exaone has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 49.4 versus 41.4. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.