Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
K-Exaone is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 49 to 31. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
K-Exaone's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 49.4 against 19. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 49.4% to 19%.
K-Exaone is the reasoning model in the pair, while Nova Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. K-Exaone gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Nova Pro.
Pick K-Exaone if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nova Pro only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
K-Exaone
49.4
Nova Pro
19
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
K-Exaone is ahead overall, 49 to 31. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 49.4% and 19%.
K-Exaone has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 49.4 versus 19. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.