Seed 1.6 vs Kimi K2

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Seed 1.6 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 65 to 34. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Seed 1.6's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 79.6 against 39.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 80 to 35.

Seed 1.6 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Kimi K2 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed 1.6 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Kimi K2.

Quick Verdict

Pick Seed 1.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Kimi K2 only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

62.3

Kimi K2

29.3

63
Terminal-Bench 2.0
27
67
BrowseComp
36
58
OSWorld-Verified
27

Coding

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

42.4

Kimi K2

12.8

64
HumanEval
24
46
SWE-bench Verified
15
38
LiveCodeBench
12
46
SWE-bench Pro
13

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

79.6

Kimi K2

39.5

80
MMMU-Pro
35
79
OfficeQA Pro
45

Reasoning

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

74.5

Kimi K2

40.9

69
SimpleQA
30
69
MuSR
28
86
BBH
61
77
LongBench v2
47
78
MRCRv2
50

Knowledge

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

56.4

Kimi K2

29.3

73
MMLU
32
72
GPQA
31
70
SuperGPQA
29
68
OpenBookQA
27
75
MMLU-Pro
51
11
HLE
3
68
FrontierScience
34

Instruction Following

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

87

Kimi K2

67

87
IFEval
67

Multilingual

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

83.4

Kimi K2

59.7

88
MGSM
61
81
MMLU-ProX
59

Mathematics

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

75.9

Kimi K2

42.7

72
AIME 2023
32
74
AIME 2024
34
73
AIME 2025
33
68
HMMT Feb 2023
28
70
HMMT Feb 2024
30
69
HMMT Feb 2025
29
71
BRUMO 2025
31
82
MATH-500
57

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seed 1.6 or Kimi K2?

Seed 1.6 is ahead overall, 65 to 34. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 80 and 35.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Seed 1.6 or Kimi K2?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.4 versus 29.3. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Seed 1.6 or Kimi K2?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 42.4 versus 12.8. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Seed 1.6 or Kimi K2?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 75.9 versus 42.7. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Seed 1.6 or Kimi K2?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 74.5 versus 40.9. Inside this category, MuSR is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed 1.6 or Kimi K2?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.3 versus 29.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Seed 1.6 or Kimi K2?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 39.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Seed 1.6 or Kimi K2?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 67. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Seed 1.6 or Kimi K2?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.4 versus 59.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.