LFM2-24B-A2B vs Qwen3 235B 2507

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

LFM2-24B-A2B finishes one point ahead overall, 38 to 37. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

LFM2-24B-A2B's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 50.4 against 46.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 42 to 31. Qwen3 235B 2507 does hit back in instruction following, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3 235B 2507 gives you the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for LFM2-24B-A2B.

Quick Verdict

Pick LFM2-24B-A2B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3 235B 2507 only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you need the larger 128K context window.

Agentic

Qwen3 235B 2507

LFM2-24B-A2B

33.4

Qwen3 235B 2507

33.7

30
Terminal-Bench 2.0
33
38
BrowseComp
40
34
OSWorld-Verified
30

Coding

LFM2-24B-A2B

LFM2-24B-A2B

18

Qwen3 235B 2507

14.6

42
HumanEval
31
18
SWE-bench Verified
15
17
LiveCodeBench
10
19
SWE-bench Pro
19

Multimodal & Grounded

LFM2-24B-A2B

LFM2-24B-A2B

41.7

Qwen3 235B 2507

41.6

39
MMMU-Pro
38
45
OfficeQA Pro
46

Reasoning

LFM2-24B-A2B

LFM2-24B-A2B

46.6

Qwen3 235B 2507

45.6

44
SimpleQA
37
42
MuSR
35
63
BBH
60
48
LongBench v2
52
45
MRCRv2
52

Knowledge

LFM2-24B-A2B

LFM2-24B-A2B

35.6

Qwen3 235B 2507

31.9

46
MMLU
39
45
GPQA
38
43
SuperGPQA
36
41
OpenBookQA
34
51
MMLU-Pro
51
4
HLE
1
43
FrontierScience
39

Instruction Following

Qwen3 235B 2507

LFM2-24B-A2B

68

Qwen3 235B 2507

69

68
IFEval
69

Multilingual

LFM2-24B-A2B

LFM2-24B-A2B

61.4

Qwen3 235B 2507

60.4

64
MGSM
63
60
MMLU-ProX
59

Mathematics

LFM2-24B-A2B

LFM2-24B-A2B

50.4

Qwen3 235B 2507

46.6

46
AIME 2023
39
48
AIME 2024
41
47
AIME 2025
40
42
HMMT Feb 2023
35
44
HMMT Feb 2024
37
43
HMMT Feb 2025
36
45
BRUMO 2025
38
57
MATH-500
57

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, LFM2-24B-A2B or Qwen3 235B 2507?

LFM2-24B-A2B is ahead overall, 38 to 37. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 42 and 31.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, LFM2-24B-A2B or Qwen3 235B 2507?

LFM2-24B-A2B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 35.6 versus 31.9. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, LFM2-24B-A2B or Qwen3 235B 2507?

LFM2-24B-A2B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 18 versus 14.6. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, LFM2-24B-A2B or Qwen3 235B 2507?

LFM2-24B-A2B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 50.4 versus 46.6. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, LFM2-24B-A2B or Qwen3 235B 2507?

LFM2-24B-A2B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 46.6 versus 45.6. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, LFM2-24B-A2B or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Qwen3 235B 2507 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 33.7 versus 33.4. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, LFM2-24B-A2B or Qwen3 235B 2507?

LFM2-24B-A2B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 41.7 versus 41.6. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, LFM2-24B-A2B or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Qwen3 235B 2507 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 69 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, LFM2-24B-A2B or Qwen3 235B 2507?

LFM2-24B-A2B has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.4 versus 60.4. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.