Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 75 to 38. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 62.3 against 18. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 77 to 30.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while LFM2-24B-A2B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) gives you the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for LFM2-24B-A2B.
Pick Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2-24B-A2B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
74.8
LFM2-24B-A2B
33.4
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
62.3
LFM2-24B-A2B
18
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
70.8
LFM2-24B-A2B
41.7
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
84.2
LFM2-24B-A2B
46.6
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
70.1
LFM2-24B-A2B
35.6
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
89
LFM2-24B-A2B
68
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
87.8
LFM2-24B-A2B
61.4
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
92.5
LFM2-24B-A2B
50.4
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is ahead overall, 75 to 38. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 77 and 30.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.1 versus 35.6. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.3 versus 18. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 92.5 versus 50.4. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 84.2 versus 46.6. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 33.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.8 versus 41.7. Inside this category, OfficeQA Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 89 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 87.8 versus 61.4. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.