Seed-2.0-Lite vs LFM2-24B-A2B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Seed-2.0-Lite is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 63 to 38. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Seed-2.0-Lite's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 79.6 against 41.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 80 to 39.

Seed-2.0-Lite is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.03 input / $0.12 output per 1M tokens for LFM2-24B-A2B. That is roughly 16.7x on output cost alone. Seed-2.0-Lite gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 32K for LFM2-24B-A2B.

Quick Verdict

Pick Seed-2.0-Lite if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2-24B-A2B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

55.1

LFM2-24B-A2B

33.4

52
Terminal-Bench 2.0
30
63
BrowseComp
38
53
OSWorld-Verified
34

Coding

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

41.4

LFM2-24B-A2B

18

63
HumanEval
42
45
SWE-bench Verified
18
37
LiveCodeBench
17
45
SWE-bench Pro
19

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

79.6

LFM2-24B-A2B

41.7

80
MMMU-Pro
39
79
OfficeQA Pro
45

Reasoning

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

73

LFM2-24B-A2B

46.6

68
SimpleQA
44
66
MuSR
42
85
BBH
63
76
LongBench v2
48
77
MRCRv2
45

Knowledge

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

53.9

LFM2-24B-A2B

35.6

71
MMLU
46
70
GPQA
45
68
SuperGPQA
43
66
OpenBookQA
41
73
MMLU-Pro
51
7
HLE
4
66
FrontierScience
43

Instruction Following

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

89

LFM2-24B-A2B

68

89
IFEval
68

Multilingual

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

82.5

LFM2-24B-A2B

61.4

87
MGSM
64
80
MMLU-ProX
60

Mathematics

Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite

75

LFM2-24B-A2B

50.4

71
AIME 2023
46
73
AIME 2024
48
72
AIME 2025
47
67
HMMT Feb 2023
42
69
HMMT Feb 2024
44
68
HMMT Feb 2025
43
70
BRUMO 2025
45
81
MATH-500
57

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seed-2.0-Lite or LFM2-24B-A2B?

Seed-2.0-Lite is ahead overall, 63 to 38. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 80 and 39.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Seed-2.0-Lite or LFM2-24B-A2B?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53.9 versus 35.6. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Seed-2.0-Lite or LFM2-24B-A2B?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 41.4 versus 18. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Seed-2.0-Lite or LFM2-24B-A2B?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 75 versus 50.4. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Seed-2.0-Lite or LFM2-24B-A2B?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 73 versus 46.6. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed-2.0-Lite or LFM2-24B-A2B?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 55.1 versus 33.4. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Seed-2.0-Lite or LFM2-24B-A2B?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 41.7. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Seed-2.0-Lite or LFM2-24B-A2B?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 89 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Seed-2.0-Lite or LFM2-24B-A2B?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.5 versus 61.4. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.