Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 60 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 71.5 against 32.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 62 to 17.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) gives you the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking.
Pick Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
58.5
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
34.1
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
35
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
8.2
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
71.5
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
32.4
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
69.2
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
38.4
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
52.1
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
27
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
81
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
72
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
77.8
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
60.7
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
75.2
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
42.3
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) is ahead overall, 60 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 62 and 17.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.1 versus 27. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 35 versus 8.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 75.2 versus 42.3. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 69.2 versus 38.4. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 58.5 versus 34.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.5 versus 32.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 72. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.8 versus 60.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.