Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 35 versus 33. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 40 against 8.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU, 71.4 to 27. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking does hit back in multilingual, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking is the reasoning model in the pair, while Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 gives you the larger context window at 64K, compared with 32K for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking.

Quick Verdict

Pick Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if multilingual is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Agentic

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

31.8

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

34.1

35
Terminal-Bench 2.0
34
32
BrowseComp
37
28
OSWorld-Verified
32

Coding

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

40

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

8.2

54.8
HumanEval
17
40
SWE-bench Pro
7
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
10
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
9

Multimodal & Grounded

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

35.5

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

32.4

35
MMMU-Pro
27
36
OfficeQA Pro
39

Reasoning

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

38.6

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

38.4

39
LongBench v2
39
38
MRCRv2
42
Coming soon
SimpleQA
29
Coming soon
MuSR
31
Coming soon
BBH
67

Knowledge

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

53

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

27

71.4
MMLU
27
53
FrontierScience
31
Coming soon
GPQA
26
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
24
Coming soon
OpenBookQA
22
Coming soon
MMLU-Pro
51
Coming soon
HLE
2

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
72

Multilingual

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

42

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

60.7

42
MMLU-ProX
60
Coming soon
MGSM
62

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
AIME 2023
28
Coming soon
AIME 2024
30
Coming soon
AIME 2025
29
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
24
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
26
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
25
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
27
Coming soon
MATH-500
61

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 is ahead overall, 35 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU, where the scores are 71.4 and 27.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53 versus 27. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 40 versus 8.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 38.6 versus 38.4. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 34.1 versus 31.8. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 35.5 versus 32.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.7 versus 42. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.