Seed 1.6 vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Seed 1.6 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 65 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Seed 1.6's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 79.6 against 32.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 80 to 27.

Seed 1.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Seed 1.6 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 32K for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking.

Quick Verdict

Pick Seed 1.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

62.3

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

34.1

63
Terminal-Bench 2.0
34
67
BrowseComp
37
58
OSWorld-Verified
32

Coding

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

42.4

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

8.2

64
HumanEval
17
46
SWE-bench Verified
10
38
LiveCodeBench
9
46
SWE-bench Pro
7

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

79.6

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

32.4

80
MMMU-Pro
27
79
OfficeQA Pro
39

Reasoning

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

74.5

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

38.4

69
SimpleQA
29
69
MuSR
31
86
BBH
67
77
LongBench v2
39
78
MRCRv2
42

Knowledge

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

56.4

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

27

73
MMLU
27
72
GPQA
26
70
SuperGPQA
24
68
OpenBookQA
22
75
MMLU-Pro
51
11
HLE
2
68
FrontierScience
31

Instruction Following

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

87

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

72

87
IFEval
72

Multilingual

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

83.4

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

60.7

88
MGSM
62
81
MMLU-ProX
60

Mathematics

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

75.9

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

42.3

72
AIME 2023
28
74
AIME 2024
30
73
AIME 2025
29
68
HMMT Feb 2023
24
70
HMMT Feb 2024
26
69
HMMT Feb 2025
25
71
BRUMO 2025
27
82
MATH-500
61

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seed 1.6 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Seed 1.6 is ahead overall, 65 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 80 and 27.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Seed 1.6 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.4 versus 27. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Seed 1.6 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 42.4 versus 8.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Seed 1.6 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 75.9 versus 42.3. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Seed 1.6 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 74.5 versus 38.4. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed 1.6 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.3 versus 34.1. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Seed 1.6 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 32.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Seed 1.6 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 72. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Seed 1.6 or LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.4 versus 60.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.