Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
LFM2.5-VL-450M
33
Qwen3.5 397B
68
Verified leaderboard positions: LFM2.5-VL-450M unranked · Qwen3.5 397B #8
Pick Qwen3.5 397B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-VL-450M only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Knowledge
+43.6 difference
Inst. Following
+31.4 difference
LFM2.5-VL-450M
Qwen3.5 397B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
96 t/s
N/A
2.44s
128K
128K
Pick Qwen3.5 397B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-VL-450M only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Qwen3.5 397B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 68 to 33. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.5 397B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 65.2 against 21.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 19.3% to 87.8%.
Qwen3.5 397B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 68 to 33. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 19.3% and 87.8%.
Qwen3.5 397B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.2 versus 21.6. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.5 397B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 92.6 versus 61.2. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.