Llama 4 Maverick vs MiniMax M2.7

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

MiniMax M2.7 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 57 to 43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiniMax M2.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 56.2 against 15.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 17% to 56.2%.

MiniMax M2.7 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 4 Maverick. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Llama 4 Maverick gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for MiniMax M2.7.

Quick Verdict

Pick MiniMax M2.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Llama 4 Maverick only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1M context window.

Agentic

MiniMax M2.7

Llama 4 Maverick

40.9

MiniMax M2.7

57

37%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
57%
51%
BrowseComp
Coming soon
38%
OSWorld-Verified
Coming soon
Coming soon
Toolathlon
46.3%
Coming soon
MLE-Bench Lite
66.6%
Coming soon
MM-ClawBench
62.7%

Coding

MiniMax M2.7

Llama 4 Maverick

15.6

MiniMax M2.7

56.2

38%
HumanEval
Coming soon
13%
SWE-bench Verified
Coming soon
15%
LiveCodeBench
Coming soon
17%
SWE-bench Pro
56.2%
Coming soon
SWE Multilingual
76.5%
Coming soon
Multi-SWE Bench
52.7%
Coming soon
VIBE-Pro
55.6%
Coming soon
NL2Repo
39.8%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

59%
MMMU-Pro
Coming soon
54%
OfficeQA Pro
Coming soon
Coming soon
GDPval-AA
1495

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

42%
MuSR
Coming soon
63%
BBH
Coming soon
63%
LongBench v2
Coming soon
63%
MRCRv2
Coming soon

Knowledge

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

46%
MMLU
Coming soon
45%
GPQA
Coming soon
43%
SuperGPQA
Coming soon
53%
MMLU-Pro
Coming soon
4%
HLE
Coming soon
45%
FrontierScience
Coming soon
44%
SimpleQA
Coming soon
Coming soon
Artificial Analysis
50

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

68%
IFEval
Coming soon

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

63%
MGSM
Coming soon
58%
MMLU-ProX
Coming soon

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

46%
AIME 2023
Coming soon
48%
AIME 2024
Coming soon
47%
AIME 2025
Coming soon
42%
HMMT Feb 2023
Coming soon
44%
HMMT Feb 2024
Coming soon
43%
HMMT Feb 2025
Coming soon
45%
BRUMO 2025
Coming soon
59%
MATH-500
Coming soon

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 is ahead overall, 57 to 43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 17% and 56.2%.

Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Maverick or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 56.2 versus 15.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Llama 4 Maverick or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 57 versus 40.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.