Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Llama 4 Scout is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 42 to 31. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Llama 4 Scout's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 57.8 against 30.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 60 to 25.
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Llama 4 Scout is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Llama 4 Scout gives you the larger context window at 10M, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning).
Pick Llama 4 Scout if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Llama 4 Scout
40.6
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
34
Llama 4 Scout
12.9
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
7.2
Llama 4 Scout
57.8
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
30.4
Llama 4 Scout
55
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
35.3
Llama 4 Scout
35.6
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
25.2
Llama 4 Scout
68
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
68
Llama 4 Scout
59.8
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
59.7
Llama 4 Scout
51
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
40.9
Llama 4 Scout is ahead overall, 42 to 31. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 60 and 25.
Llama 4 Scout has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 35.6 versus 25.2. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Llama 4 Scout has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 12.9 versus 7.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Llama 4 Scout has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 51 versus 40.9. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Llama 4 Scout has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 55 versus 35.3. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Llama 4 Scout has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 40.6 versus 34. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Llama 4 Scout has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 57.8 versus 30.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning) are effectively tied for instruction following here, both landing at 68 on average.
Llama 4 Scout has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 59.8 versus 59.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.