o3 vs Mercury 2

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

o3 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 70 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

o3's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 66 against 57.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 58 to 43.

o3 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $10.00 input / $40.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens for Mercury 2. That is roughly 53.3x on output cost alone. o3 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mercury 2.

Quick Verdict

Pick o3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mercury 2 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

o3

o3

69.9

Mercury 2

63.7

71
Terminal-Bench 2.0
63
75
BrowseComp
67
65
OSWorld-Verified
62

Coding

o3

o3

49.1

Mercury 2

41.1

78
HumanEval
75
50
SWE-bench Verified
46
40
LiveCodeBench
38
58
SWE-bench Pro
43

Multimodal & Grounded

o3

o3

72.3

Mercury 2

68.3

70
MMMU-Pro
66
75
OfficeQA Pro
71

Reasoning

o3

o3

82.6

Mercury 2

80.1

84
SimpleQA
82
82
MuSR
82
86
BBH
87
82
LongBench v2
77
81
MRCRv2
76

Knowledge

o3

o3

66

Mercury 2

57.2

86
MMLU
78
87
GPQA
78
85
SuperGPQA
76
83
OpenBookQA
74
75
MMLU-Pro
72
24
HLE
9
77
FrontierScience
69

Instruction Following

o3

o3

85

Mercury 2

84

85
IFEval
84

Multilingual

o3

o3

81.1

Mercury 2

79.7

83
MGSM
81
80
MMLU-ProX
79

Mathematics

o3

o3

87.5

Mercury 2

80.9

88
AIME 2023
81
90
AIME 2024
83
89
AIME 2025
82
84
HMMT Feb 2023
77
86
HMMT Feb 2024
79
85
HMMT Feb 2025
78
87
BRUMO 2025
80
88
MATH-500
82

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, o3 or Mercury 2?

o3 is ahead overall, 70 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 58 and 43.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, o3 or Mercury 2?

o3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66 versus 57.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, o3 or Mercury 2?

o3 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 49.1 versus 41.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, o3 or Mercury 2?

o3 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 87.5 versus 80.9. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, o3 or Mercury 2?

o3 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 80.1. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, o3 or Mercury 2?

o3 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 63.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, o3 or Mercury 2?

o3 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 72.3 versus 68.3. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, o3 or Mercury 2?

o3 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 85 versus 84. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, o3 or Mercury 2?

o3 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.1 versus 79.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.