Mercury 2 vs o4-mini (high)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Mercury 2 has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 65 versus 63. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Mercury 2's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 63.7 against 58.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 62 to 55. o4-mini (high) does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Mercury 2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while o4-mini (high) is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. o4-mini (high) gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mercury 2.

Quick Verdict

Pick Mercury 2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o4-mini (high) only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window.

Agentic

Mercury 2

Mercury 2

63.7

o4-mini (high)

58.5

63
Terminal-Bench 2.0
58
67
BrowseComp
64
62
OSWorld-Verified
55

Coding

Mercury 2

Mercury 2

41.1

o4-mini (high)

38.7

75
HumanEval
74
46
SWE-bench Verified
45
38
LiveCodeBench
34
43
SWE-bench Pro
42

Multimodal & Grounded

Tie

Mercury 2

68.3

o4-mini (high)

68.3

66
MMMU-Pro
66
71
OfficeQA Pro
71

Reasoning

Mercury 2

Mercury 2

80.1

o4-mini (high)

77.4

82
SimpleQA
80
82
MuSR
78
87
BBH
83
77
LongBench v2
75
76
MRCRv2
74

Knowledge

o4-mini (high)

Mercury 2

57.2

o4-mini (high)

61.2

78
MMLU
82
78
GPQA
82
76
SuperGPQA
80
74
OpenBookQA
78
72
MMLU-Pro
76
9
HLE
13
69
FrontierScience
73

Instruction Following

Mercury 2

Mercury 2

84

o4-mini (high)

83

84
IFEval
83

Multilingual

o4-mini (high)

Mercury 2

79.7

o4-mini (high)

81.7

81
MGSM
83
79
MMLU-ProX
81

Mathematics

o4-mini (high)

Mercury 2

80.9

o4-mini (high)

82.9

81
AIME 2023
83
83
AIME 2024
85
82
AIME 2025
84
77
HMMT Feb 2023
79
79
HMMT Feb 2024
81
78
HMMT Feb 2025
80
80
BRUMO 2025
82
82
MATH-500
84

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Mercury 2 or o4-mini (high)?

Mercury 2 is ahead overall, 65 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 62 and 55.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Mercury 2 or o4-mini (high)?

o4-mini (high) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.2 versus 57.2. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Mercury 2 or o4-mini (high)?

Mercury 2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 41.1 versus 38.7. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Mercury 2 or o4-mini (high)?

o4-mini (high) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 82.9 versus 80.9. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Mercury 2 or o4-mini (high)?

Mercury 2 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 80.1 versus 77.4. Inside this category, MuSR is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Mercury 2 or o4-mini (high)?

Mercury 2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 63.7 versus 58.5. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Mercury 2 or o4-mini (high)?

Mercury 2 and o4-mini (high) are effectively tied for multimodal and grounded tasks here, both landing at 68.3 on average.

Which is better for instruction following, Mercury 2 or o4-mini (high)?

Mercury 2 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84 versus 83. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Mercury 2 or o4-mini (high)?

o4-mini (high) has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.7 versus 79.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.