Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
82
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
68
Verified leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5-Pro unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #6
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Agentic
+12.3 difference
Coding
+14.8 difference
Knowledge
+33.6 difference
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
$1 / $3
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
262K
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 82 to 68. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 68.4 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 68.4% to 49.4%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.00 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 82 to 68. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 68.4% and 49.4%.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 48. MiMo-V2.5-Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 57.2. MiMo-V2.5-Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.4 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.