MiMo-V2-Flash vs Seed-2.0-Lite

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

MiMo-V2-Flash has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 66 versus 63. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

MiMo-V2-Flash's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 50 against 41.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 49 to 37. Seed-2.0-Lite does hit back in instruction following, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiMo-V2-Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while Seed-2.0-Lite is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed-2.0-Lite gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for MiMo-V2-Flash.

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2-Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Seed-2.0-Lite only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Agentic

MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash

61.8

Seed-2.0-Lite

55.1

63
Terminal-Bench 2.0
52
65
BrowseComp
63
58
OSWorld-Verified
53

Coding

MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash

50

Seed-2.0-Lite

41.4

71
HumanEval
63
45
SWE-bench Verified
45
49
LiveCodeBench
37
52
SWE-bench Pro
45

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed-2.0-Lite

MiMo-V2-Flash

75.8

Seed-2.0-Lite

79.6

78
MMMU-Pro
80
73
OfficeQA Pro
79

Reasoning

MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash

75.3

Seed-2.0-Lite

73

76
SimpleQA
68
74
MuSR
66
85
BBH
85
74
LongBench v2
76
73
MRCRv2
77

Knowledge

MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash

58.8

Seed-2.0-Lite

53.9

79
MMLU
71
78
GPQA
70
76
SuperGPQA
68
74
OpenBookQA
66
72
MMLU-Pro
73
14
HLE
7
71
FrontierScience
66

Instruction Following

Seed-2.0-Lite

MiMo-V2-Flash

84

Seed-2.0-Lite

89

84
IFEval
89

Multilingual

Seed-2.0-Lite

MiMo-V2-Flash

79.1

Seed-2.0-Lite

82.5

83
MGSM
87
77
MMLU-ProX
80

Mathematics

MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash

83.4

Seed-2.0-Lite

75

79
AIME 2023
71
81
AIME 2024
73
80
AIME 2025
72
75
HMMT Feb 2023
67
77
HMMT Feb 2024
69
76
HMMT Feb 2025
68
78
BRUMO 2025
70
90
MATH-500
81

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, MiMo-V2-Flash or Seed-2.0-Lite?

MiMo-V2-Flash is ahead overall, 66 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 49 and 37.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, MiMo-V2-Flash or Seed-2.0-Lite?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 58.8 versus 53.9. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2-Flash or Seed-2.0-Lite?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 50 versus 41.4. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, MiMo-V2-Flash or Seed-2.0-Lite?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 83.4 versus 75. Inside this category, MATH-500 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, MiMo-V2-Flash or Seed-2.0-Lite?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 75.3 versus 73. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MiMo-V2-Flash or Seed-2.0-Lite?

MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.8 versus 55.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, MiMo-V2-Flash or Seed-2.0-Lite?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 75.8. Inside this category, OfficeQA Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, MiMo-V2-Flash or Seed-2.0-Lite?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 89 versus 84. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, MiMo-V2-Flash or Seed-2.0-Lite?

Seed-2.0-Lite has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.5 versus 79.1. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.