MiniMax M2.7 vs o3-mini

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

o3-mini is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 70 to 57. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

o3-mini's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 66.6 against 57. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 57% to 67%. MiniMax M2.7 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

o3-mini is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M2.7. That is roughly 3.7x on output cost alone. o3-mini is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M2.7 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Quick Verdict

Pick o3-mini if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

o3-mini

MiniMax M2.7

57

o3-mini

66.6

57%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
67%
46.3%
Toolathlon
Coming soon
66.6%
MLE-Bench Lite
Coming soon
62.7%
MM-ClawBench
Coming soon
Coming soon
BrowseComp
74%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
61%

Coding

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax M2.7

56.2

o3-mini

55

56.2%
SWE-bench Pro
57%
76.5%
SWE Multilingual
Coming soon
52.7%
Multi-SWE Bench
Coming soon
55.6%
VIBE-Pro
Coming soon
39.8%
NL2Repo
Coming soon
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
49.3%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

1495
GDPval-AA
Coming soon
Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
73%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
76%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
LongBench v2
82%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
80%

Knowledge

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

50
Artificial Analysis
Coming soon
Coming soon
MMLU
86.9%
Coming soon
GPQA
77.2%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
66%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
93.9%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
73%

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
AIME 2024
87.3%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, MiniMax M2.7 or o3-mini?

o3-mini is ahead overall, 70 to 57. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 57% and 67%.

Which is better for coding, MiniMax M2.7 or o3-mini?

MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 56.2 versus 55. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MiniMax M2.7 or o3-mini?

o3-mini has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.6 versus 57. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.