Seed 1.6 vs Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Seed 1.6 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 65 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Seed 1.6's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 79.6 against 71.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MRCRv2, 78 to 66.

Seed 1.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning). That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Seed 1.6 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning).

Quick Verdict

Pick Seed 1.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

62.3

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

58.5

63
Terminal-Bench 2.0
60
67
BrowseComp
61
58
OSWorld-Verified
55

Coding

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

42.4

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

35

64
HumanEval
62
46
SWE-bench Verified
39
38
LiveCodeBench
33
46
SWE-bench Pro
36

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

79.6

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

71.5

80
MMMU-Pro
71
79
OfficeQA Pro
72

Reasoning

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

74.5

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

69.2

69
SimpleQA
70
69
MuSR
70
86
BBH
80
77
LongBench v2
66
78
MRCRv2
66

Knowledge

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

56.4

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

52.1

73
MMLU
71
72
GPQA
70
70
SuperGPQA
68
68
OpenBookQA
66
75
MMLU-Pro
69
11
HLE
7
68
FrontierScience
62

Instruction Following

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

87

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

81

87
IFEval
81

Multilingual

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

83.4

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

77.8

88
MGSM
81
81
MMLU-ProX
76

Mathematics

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6

75.9

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

75.2

72
AIME 2023
73
74
AIME 2024
75
73
AIME 2025
74
68
HMMT Feb 2023
69
70
HMMT Feb 2024
71
69
HMMT Feb 2025
70
71
BRUMO 2025
72
82
MATH-500
79

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seed 1.6 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 is ahead overall, 65 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MRCRv2, where the scores are 78 and 66.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Seed 1.6 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.4 versus 52.1. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Seed 1.6 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 42.4 versus 35. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Seed 1.6 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 75.9 versus 75.2. Inside this category, MATH-500 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Seed 1.6 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 74.5 versus 69.2. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed 1.6 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.3 versus 58.5. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Seed 1.6 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.6 versus 71.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Seed 1.6 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 81. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Seed 1.6 or Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.4 versus 77.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.