Seed 1.6 Flash vs Ministral 3 14B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Seed 1.6 Flash finishes one point ahead overall, 56 to 55. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

Seed 1.6 Flash's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 54.5 against 48.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MRCRv2, 74 to 60. Ministral 3 14B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Seed 1.6 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.08 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ministral 3 14B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Seed 1.6 Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while Ministral 3 14B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed 1.6 Flash gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 14B.

Quick Verdict

Pick Seed 1.6 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 14B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

54.5

Ministral 3 14B

48.4

52
Terminal-Bench 2.0
48
62
BrowseComp
55
52
OSWorld-Verified
44

Coding

Ministral 3 14B

Seed 1.6 Flash

27.6

Ministral 3 14B

33

59
HumanEval
58
24
SWE-bench Verified
37
25
LiveCodeBench
31
31
SWE-bench Pro
34

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

73.1

Ministral 3 14B

70.5

74
MMMU-Pro
70
72
OfficeQA Pro
71

Reasoning

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

66.8

Ministral 3 14B

63.6

61
SimpleQA
66
59
MuSR
64
75
BBH
74
70
LongBench v2
60
74
MRCRv2
60

Knowledge

Ministral 3 14B

Seed 1.6 Flash

47.3

Ministral 3 14B

50.1

65
MMLU
69
64
GPQA
68
62
SuperGPQA
66
60
OpenBookQA
64
65
MMLU-Pro
67
3
HLE
5
57
FrontierScience
60

Instruction Following

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

81

Ministral 3 14B

80

81
IFEval
80

Multilingual

Ministral 3 14B

Seed 1.6 Flash

72.8

Ministral 3 14B

76.8

76
MGSM
80
71
MMLU-ProX
75

Mathematics

Ministral 3 14B

Seed 1.6 Flash

67.1

Ministral 3 14B

69.7

64
AIME 2023
68
66
AIME 2024
70
65
AIME 2025
72
60
HMMT Feb 2023
64
62
HMMT Feb 2024
66
61
HMMT Feb 2025
65
63
BRUMO 2025
67
72
MATH-500
72

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seed 1.6 Flash or Ministral 3 14B?

Seed 1.6 Flash is ahead overall, 56 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MRCRv2, where the scores are 74 and 60.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Ministral 3 14B?

Ministral 3 14B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 50.1 versus 47.3. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Seed 1.6 Flash or Ministral 3 14B?

Ministral 3 14B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 33 versus 27.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Seed 1.6 Flash or Ministral 3 14B?

Ministral 3 14B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 69.7 versus 67.1. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Seed 1.6 Flash or Ministral 3 14B?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 66.8 versus 63.6. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Ministral 3 14B?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.5 versus 48.4. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Ministral 3 14B?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 70.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Seed 1.6 Flash or Ministral 3 14B?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 80. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Ministral 3 14B?

Ministral 3 14B has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.8 versus 72.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.